@Drabslab, Oh, so now you are running away with my idea... 😉 (just joking)
I agree with @Timo-Martosatiman-MRA that only relevant info should be displayed. Problem is everyone has different ideas about relevance. Thats where user-configurability comes in. The on/off switching of data fields should above all be easy. We don't want to turn Navigation into some geek-thing like a Zumo 😂

@Hans-van-de-Ven-MRA-Master, yes I know, twenty is a bit much. But speed is already on your dashboard (although een logican datfield to be shown). Nice info is Arrival time, Arrival distance, distance to next guidance (if you are going straight on a long road it is nice to know in advance so you can get into cruise mode 😉 ), Height is an item I very much like, Distance to next waypoint (not shaping point). I think I am forgetting some useful options here 😉

@Nick-Carthew

Welkom op het forum @Patrick-De-Wilde vanuit het Brabantse Helmond
Welcome to the forum @Patrick-De-Wilde from Helmond in Brabant

@Steve-Lynch said in Suggestion: routing options in planner transfer to Navigation Next:

I had a brain freeze

That is good if it does not last for too long.

If nothing else, it proves you have a brain 🙂 🙂 🙂

@Larry-Stayner-0

If you are using the gpx 1.2, you must turn off route recalculation on the Zumo XT

De eerste Webinar staat gepland op volgende week donderdag 6 oktober om 20.00 uur in het Nederlands en 21.00 uur in het Engels (8:00 pm London time). De techniek werkt, microfoon kan volgende week wel uit bij de intro en outro, maar ook niet erg als je iemand hoort lachen op de achtergrond 😆. Hou je mail in de gaten voor de uitnodiging: https://youtu.be/QYIlrVtYmFc

The first Webinar is scheduled for next Thursday, October 6 at 8:00 pm in Dutch and 9:00 pm in English (8:00 pm London time). The technique works, microphone can be turned off next week at the intro and outro, but also not bad if you hear someone laughing in the background 😆. Keep an eye on your mail for the invitation: https://youtu.be/QYIlrVtYmFc

Thanks Nick and excellent suggestion. The RouteXperts ensure the quality on delivery, but infrastructure is a continuously evolving thing.

Where today we go through the tunnel of St. Gothard or the similarly named alpine pass, to reach beautiful italy from mainland europe, in a few years we might all be using the Brenner Base Tunnel. One previously rightly placed waypoint might then suddenly lead to a very uncomfortable detour.

@Nick-Carthew many thanks will try it.

@Con-Hennekens said in Suggestion: GPS measured speed - gray out on no GPS signal:

@Rob-Verhoeff , +1! (just joking 😉 )

👍 😁

@Timo-Martosatiman-MRA Projects can, no matter the good intentions, the great idea's, the involvement and motivation of the resources, fail or be hugely successful for external reasons that the project has no influence on.

It is very useful to do a post mortem on any project, success or disaster, after it has ended and learn from it (and find area's for future projects 🙂 ).

@Piet-van-der-Horst

Hallo Piet,
Unzip eerst het bestand. In het zip bestand zitten de bestanden die je nodig hebt, namelijk de Track.gpx of de Route.gpx.
Op de ondersteuningspagina staan de handleidingen "Handleiding 'Uploaden van route, route-track en tracklog'"
Volg de stappen in de handleiding en dan moet het zeker lukken.

@LR A little search on the forum shows you this topic (click).

@Jan-Weerheim I completely agree. For me, this is an essential requirement.

@Russ-1, a non-paid membership is enough to share routes. Why does your wife need navigation on the back of the bike? And the auto-skip-waypoints works really well for me. But I am not too frantic about deviating from the route between 2 waypoints, knowing that I have enough waypoints to make the deviation really small.

@Jack-van-Tilburg
Same answer Jack,
Nothing I am doing affects anyone elses ability to use all functionality they want when Next is up and running.

I agree with your suggestions above where you indicate that blockages should be managed by distance rather than skipping Via or Shaping Points.

"-Possibility to calculate an alternative route section in the event of an obstacle in the route. Preferably with a choice regarding the length of the alternative."

@Corjan-Meijerink
😉🤣