@john-s-parry Something so beautiful helps on site Before the start: as info the pictures [image: 1788594501561-img_1254.png] WP 13 : During navigation [image: 1788594733482-img_1255.png]

Just use the nearest gas station as a starting point when you want to share your routes.

To add some historical context to this feature request, the exact multi-day scheduling logic we are talking about was actually an industry standard over a decade ago in Microsoft AutoRoute (known as Microsoft Streets & Trips in North America). For those who remember using it, that software had a dedicated planning module that executed this flawlessly. You could set rigid travel parameters: Start/End of Day: Defining that you start riding at 08:30 and must stop by 17:30. Daily Driving Limits: Setting a maximum cap of saddle hours or kilometers per day. Cadenced Breaks: Instructing the engine to automatically insert a 15-minute rest stop every 2 hours of driving. Once you set these rules, the software would automatically slice a massive macro-route into manageable daily stages, placing overnight stop markers exactly where your time or distance limits were reached. Modern cloud planners have evolved immensely in terms of maps, UI, and GPX track accuracy, but this specific logistical engine was somehow left behind. Reintroducing a modern version of that old Microsoft routing logic into MRA's multi-map environment would instantly make it the ultimate, unrivaled tool for anyone planning extensive tours. ️

@Stevedo-6-0 said: The thread I referenced got me wondering, what's the difference between the car mode and the motorcycle mode other than the icon used in the UI. I don't know if things have changed over time. But I've experienced errant HERE routing behavior using motorcycle mode is the past. I created a thread (early 2025) on the exact same subject: https://forum.myrouteapp.com/topic/8725/route-makes-unexpected-detour?_=1788099597446 I won't repeat what's in the post -- it's a straightforward read. To cut to the chase, use CAR instead of MOTORCYCLE. It's one of the (many many) HERE things that MRA can't do anything about. Maybe the behavior has changed, but I don't remember a forum topic announcing it.

@Marinus-van-Deudekom Thank you so much. I will check it out. I love this app and software.

The data that MRA uses in the HERE map for navigation are not live, so a bit older, but show a tendency where, for example, traffic jams can form. Construction sites that are reported to HERE are displayed and taken into account in the route calculation as long as no WP / SP is in the construction site. If this is the case, there is often a strange behavior at this point. Then you should zoom in on the place and correct the place. —-###—- Die Daten die MRA in der HERE Karte bei der Navigation nutzt sind nicht Live, somit etwas älter, zeigen aber eine Tendenz wo sich zum Beispiel Staus bilden können. Baustellen die bei HERE gemeldet sind werden angezeigt und bei der Routen Berechnung berücksichtigt solange kein WP / SP in der Baustelle liegt. Sollte das so sein ergibt sich an der Stelle oft ein merkwürdiges Verhalten. Dann sollte man sich die Stelle heran zoomen und die Stelle korrigieren. [image: 1787992393562-img_1127.png]

You can sort on NAME or on date of modification

@Ruurt-Visser Het staat in het gedeelte met suggesties voor de mobiele app It is in the suggestion section for the Mobile app https://forum.myrouteapp.com/post/82693

@nomko on the contrary. I gave you an apologie but if you instead there's nothing I van do.

You’re absolutely right. In most cases, I can see it because the point is already quite close to the road. But sometimes I do indeed have to zoom out first to find the correct position. In those cases, it would be easy.

@Jan-Jans-Gold-0-0 het is altijd verstandig om op te letten

@richtea999 said: As an option, not as default. Sometimes I want a waypoint to be off-road, because the map isn't accurate or the point isn't mapped. I can understand why it might have originally received a dismissive reply - it's quite tricky to describe, let alone code. Making decisions for inexperienced users is OK, but it might need to zoom in and offer options to the user: 'Which side of the dual carriageway did you want to snap to?' 'When you clicked vaguely near that main road, did you mean that tiny backroad 50m south of it?' 'You clicked on a body of water. I've randomly picked the north road because it's closer, even though it's not a main road. OK/Cancel?' But the pros: great for new users less discussion about routes going wrong on the forum! Others, such as Kurviger have implemented this feature. I would suggest that if you want the best off-road navigation experience you try DMD2. Why not set a default e.g. snap to road and then allow the user to set a flag to unsnap specific points and move them off the road when needed. Or a toggle, snap all points to road on/off etc. etc. I'd much rather there was a "sensible"*** default and then options to change the default as required. At the moment we just get a default and that's it. *** of course, we'll never be able to agree on what's sensible

I agree with a folder having totals included for each. When one is planning a tour is is interesting to know just how much one will have to do. May stop some over enthusiastic route planning.

Thanks Peter, I will try that.

Yes, please!

@nomko not completely correct is a more kind reaction to @nick-carthew post.

@Marinus-van-Deudekom Ja, gewoon met 2 knoppen om de 2 verschillende optie te tonen, ideaal tijdens het plannen van je route, de tijden tussen de "harde" punten [image: 1785945205938-505a7d7a-9f53-4e52-a0e0-1578207b7195-image.jpeg]

Ok, my version Every day has its own color. [image: 1785880329394-1000066992.jpg]