Hi @Chris-Brooker as far as I know Gold is the top level of subscription for the route planner & allows access to all & every function within the route planner What level above Gold are you referring too? Are you asking about the MRA Navigation Next? https://www.myrouteapp.com/en/shop

De huidige werkwijze is vaak niet verkeerd totdat je ineens veel heen en weer wisselt en je dan merkt dat je constant instellingen moet wijzigen. Ik maakt een route met de TomTom kaart en TomTom layer. Vervolgens maak ik een route met de Here kaart en de Here layer. Ik ga weer terug naar de TomTom route maar deze staat nu op de here layer. Veranderd dus weer naar TomTom Layer. Maak wat wijzigingen en ga weer terug naar de Here route. Deze staat nu met de TomTom Layer. Dus die kan dus eerst weer terug zetten naar de Here layer. Hoogst irritant. Lijkt mij een kleine moeite dat er een aanpassing komt zodat de laatste gebruikte instelling bewaard wordt met de route.

@Mzokk Yes it is a pitty that MRA only uses the name field in the import. If you look at there export of GPX files they reference the garmin extensions but do not use them…. I am also transfering my tools van Excel to java script to not be depending on MS. I can make my POI and edit tracks in Java script but still need Basecamp to upload them into my garmin devices. I also expect the connectivity with the garmin devices is going intomthe background as the focus seems to be on the MRA routing app.

When you want to know the distance anywhere in your routes, simply click on the altitude gaphics map [image: 1758102063527-2a04ec85-071f-4bab-9e3a-e7b0d62e38fb-image.png] Now hoover with your mouse over the graphic and you see the exact position and altitude after xxx km. [image: 1758102085708-4ba8f74f-51f5-4f39-be6c-938a9ddf6622-image.png] On the map this position is sowed with a little flag with the altitude. In this way you can schedule your route very precisely [image: 1758102142847-7f767f5e-5e9b-41a7-b598-c929e0f5ba37-image.png]

@Corrado-Miniati-0 said in Assign a via point/waypoint number: @Bert, thanks for the explanation. Unfortunately, the current inconvenience remains. yes, I agree.

@Lenny-O if I am reading your post correctly then I think what your after is already possible with MRA without the need for any form of syncs for tracks firstly I am going to assume by snapshot you mean a screenshot of the page, so just a picture of the route & you want this to be a clean uncluttered image of the path of the planned trip with no waypoints the simplest way to achieve this is to just create a new blank route then go to the side menu & select Routes > Add & add the route you want to screenshot you should be able to get a result something like this on the right [image: 1757961933077-56ea7336-31f7-45a2-a4a4-70f1c435a97a-image.png] you can even choose what colour you want the pseudo track to be & if you wanted also add in a few "Points of Interest" to make it a bit more informative

@Reinhard-Punz Please try to use the same language that the topic is using, this makes it easier for all to follow. Thanks

Thank You, that was most helpful. Steve

@Brian-McG I wonder if it's an issue with Oneplus then... Thanks for letting me know you had an issue but then it stopped. Mine started with 4.4.0. Don't know what changed.

@Nick-Carthew I do love when you can see a conversation thread with the discussion just being a bit out of sync & a little at cross purposes this post is in the "[Web] Suggestions and Discussion" section when @ian-davies-2 is asking about "a way to make these side roads bigger, brighter and easier to see while route planning" but he "forgot to mention its on the phone." as the original question is asking about maps & planning in the phone MRA Routeplanner, the map options that Ian may be interested in are those in the Menu > Map Style [image: 1757019560177-05d63a70-43d3-44cc-9a4d-805138a467a6-image.png] @ian-davies-2 you may be disappointed, none of the choices give a really really clear contrast for the small unclassified roads

@Nick-Carthew said in Full MyRoute-App CarPlay Map Integration in central instrument cluster: I thought that when you bought an Aston Martin, it comes with a bikini wearing girl sitting in the passenger seat reading you instructions from a map. I've seen it in 007. Well that actually would explain the price...

I have had the same idea (riding the MSD) on my radar for some time now. When following suggested trips, I always prefer tracks over routes as they stick closer to the original intention or, even better, use tracklogs - I like the idea of following someone's traces. @Richard-18 said in Is there any plan to allow the stitching together of tracks?: To do that, I need to convert the tracks into routes. The MSD Webpage includes links to all MSD parts, which lead to routes provided by Kurviger. Where did you get the tracks? @Richard-18 said in Is there any plan to allow the stitching together of tracks?: ...my question as to whether MyRoute’s owners had any plans to add ‘track stitching together’ in some future update. If they don’t and / or or people don’t see too much of a value in it. Even if editing tracks may not be part of a core planning task in MRA (where planning focuses on routes), MRA offers track navigation as well, and there are some capabilities for maintaining tracklogs. Therefore, IMHO, basic features such as splitting and merging tracks would be conceivable.

Thanks all. I knew the suggestions, however I like a |Finish flag at the end of the route. However I use now a red hand to suggest this is the end.

does not help you, but I do not have that problem. After importing the GPX1.1(route, track) I get 3 options. Import as a track, or as waypoints, or as support points. All seem to work but I prefer the waypoint option. I am using a Samsung S20. I usually have less than 15 points on a route.

@Lex.Kloet.RX Danke für deine Info! So hatte ich es erwartet und erhofft.

Ik zit in de creatieve sector en met creativiteit vind ik wel mooie routes, maar MRA helpt mij aardig vooruit de met routegenerator om het voorbereidend werk te doen. Maximaal aantal bochten en grootste hoogtes, het vermijden van snelwegen, tolwegen, carpooling en ook wel grote wegen. Ik laat het uittekenen volgens de denkpatronen van TomTom.. Daarna ga ik zelf aan de slag en ga de routepunten automatisch laten vermeerderen, met name 1 waypoint om de 5 km. Ik start ook de vergelijkingsmodus met denkpatronen van Here. Dan ga ik verschillende onderliggende mappen raadplegen zoals Michelin, Google Maps Hhybride enzovoort. Interessant is ook de Open Cyclo Maps erbij te nemen, want toegeven fietsers en mountainbikes rijden ook wel door mooie landschappen en dat kan inspirerend werken. Ik ga ook soms piepen bij de concurrentie, namelijk onze Vlaamse routeplanner RouteYou uit Gent. Het vraagt wat werk, maar als je inzoomt met OSM, zie je ook de mooie kastelen, monumenten, kerken, uitzicht punten en parken in de buurt van de route. Soms kan je ook do door de velden of wijngaarden of bossen rijden : de dirty roads. De TET-paden of ACT-paden raadplegen geeft weer andere inzichten. Je zou een Waypoint-Generator kunnen ontwikkelen dat een scenic route of rondrit opstelt op basis van bijvoorbeeld wijngaarden of kastelen in de Loire streek of de beste uitzichtpunten vanuit je startpunt. Langs rivieren of langs kustlijn of Romaanse kerken of de whisky route in Schotland (kan gevaarlijk zijn) Dankzij super software, want ik gebruik niet graag het woord artificiële intelligentie, kan je hiermee ook aan de slag. Er is met de motorfiets al zoveel te ontdekken in Europa dat je eigenlijk nooit tweemaal dezelfde route hoeft te rijden binnen de ons omringende landen. En inderdaad, zoals hier gezegd is, kan dat lokale bevolking ook tips geven: ik heb het al meegemaakt met Italiaanse boswachters in de bergen. En dan zijn er ook die vele onverhardeimin of meer vlakke wegen met waterplassen en kleine geulen zonder over rotsblokken en boomstammen te moeten rijden met die zware Allroad motorfiets.

@Jem-Cotton said in MyRouteApp (WebPlanner) development Roadmap: Hi. When we had our last interchange about prospects for the web planner, I was cautiously optimistic. Cautious because we've had many promises in the years that I've been using it, of a big nd much overdue overhaul - not tinkering with the appearance, but addressing core usability. In the event, the expected 'announcement this or next month' now feels like a brush off, and accordingly I am feeling cheated that I invested in a lifetime membership in a product that is in effect largely stagnant. It's such a pity as for very little work in real terms, big improvements could be made and the result would I'm sure validate the faith put in the development team by countless lifetime gold membership users. Sorry to sound negative, but we've been here too many times. It could be worse! You could have paid £600 for a Garmin zumo XT for them to leave everyone with no development even when issues are pointed out to them and whats causing the issue they just brush it off and do nothing! At least MRA is getting developed

Nee, in de huidige Web Applicatie is dat helaas niet mogelijk.

@Guzzist said in MRA_Routeplanner - difference between Track and Route-Track?: For me, there is no difference between self recorded Tracklogs to Track. I guess we don't agree on this one... I would hate my ordently managed routes to be spoiled by tracklogs. You can however save a tracklog as gpx, and re-import it as a route-track. Otr just import received tracklogs as route-track instead of tracklog. This way you will find them amongst your routes.