In my case, but I think for many if not all users, it would be a very significant update.

@Reinhard-Punz Please try to use the same language that the topic is using, this makes it easier for all to follow. Thanks

@Lenny-O said in Have a Track available along with the Route: Can we please implement the ability to have the Track along with the planned Route? It should be dynamically synched as the route is modified, Like @Marinus-van-Deudekom mentioned, this already exists. It's just not presented as a separate entry, but is indeed used to present the white line while navigating, and to enable the "Navigate route as track" feature. Currently I am not aware of a way to have the Track without first saving a route and than importing it back into the Route Planner as a track. No there indeed is no feature to save a route as a track directly into your library. If anyone is curious as to WHY I want a track - there are a number of reasons... I know there are a number of reasons, but I am interested in your specific reasons. Maybe your reasons are so great that they could help developers to take action

Thank You, that was most helpful. Steve

@CD130 said in Instellingen opslaan bij de route: Persoonlijk vind ik de huidige werkwijze prima. Het wisselen van overlay is een kleine moeite Zo denk ik er ook over! Standaard op de HERE staan, soms wisselen naar OSM of Google Maps satellite... Zo gepiept!

@Brian-McG I wonder if it's an issue with Oneplus then... Thanks for letting me know you had an issue but then it stopped. Mine started with 4.4.0. Don't know what changed.

@Nick-Carthew I do love when you can see a conversation thread with the discussion just being a bit out of sync & a little at cross purposes this post is in the "[Web] Suggestions and Discussion" section when @ian-davies-2 is asking about "a way to make these side roads bigger, brighter and easier to see while route planning" but he "forgot to mention its on the phone." as the original question is asking about maps & planning in the phone MRA Routeplanner, the map options that Ian may be interested in are those in the Menu > Map Style [image: 1757019560177-05d63a70-43d3-44cc-9a4d-805138a467a6-image.png] @ian-davies-2 you may be disappointed, none of the choices give a really really clear contrast for the small unclassified roads

@Nick-Carthew said in Full MyRoute-App CarPlay Map Integration in central instrument cluster: I thought that when you bought an Aston Martin, it comes with a bikini wearing girl sitting in the passenger seat reading you instructions from a map. I've seen it in 007. Well that actually would explain the price...

I have had the same idea (riding the MSD) on my radar for some time now. When following suggested trips, I always prefer tracks over routes as they stick closer to the original intention or, even better, use tracklogs - I like the idea of following someone's traces. @Richard-18 said in Is there any plan to allow the stitching together of tracks?: To do that, I need to convert the tracks into routes. The MSD Webpage includes links to all MSD parts, which lead to routes provided by Kurviger. Where did you get the tracks? @Richard-18 said in Is there any plan to allow the stitching together of tracks?: ...my question as to whether MyRoute’s owners had any plans to add ‘track stitching together’ in some future update. If they don’t and / or or people don’t see too much of a value in it. Even if editing tracks may not be part of a core planning task in MRA (where planning focuses on routes), MRA offers track navigation as well, and there are some capabilities for maintaining tracklogs. Therefore, IMHO, basic features such as splitting and merging tracks would be conceivable.

Thanks all. I knew the suggestions, however I like a |Finish flag at the end of the route. However I use now a red hand to suggest this is the end.

does not help you, but I do not have that problem. After importing the GPX1.1(route, track) I get 3 options. Import as a track, or as waypoints, or as support points. All seem to work but I prefer the waypoint option. I am using a Samsung S20. I usually have less than 15 points on a route.

@Lex.Kloet.RX Danke für deine Info! So hatte ich es erwartet und erhofft.

Ik zit in de creatieve sector en met creativiteit vind ik wel mooie routes, maar MRA helpt mij aardig vooruit de met routegenerator om het voorbereidend werk te doen. Maximaal aantal bochten en grootste hoogtes, het vermijden van snelwegen, tolwegen, carpooling en ook wel grote wegen. Ik laat het uittekenen volgens de denkpatronen van TomTom.. Daarna ga ik zelf aan de slag en ga de routepunten automatisch laten vermeerderen, met name 1 waypoint om de 5 km. Ik start ook de vergelijkingsmodus met denkpatronen van Here. Dan ga ik verschillende onderliggende mappen raadplegen zoals Michelin, Google Maps Hhybride enzovoort. Interessant is ook de Open Cyclo Maps erbij te nemen, want toegeven fietsers en mountainbikes rijden ook wel door mooie landschappen en dat kan inspirerend werken. Ik ga ook soms piepen bij de concurrentie, namelijk onze Vlaamse routeplanner RouteYou uit Gent. Het vraagt wat werk, maar als je inzoomt met OSM, zie je ook de mooie kastelen, monumenten, kerken, uitzicht punten en parken in de buurt van de route. Soms kan je ook do door de velden of wijngaarden of bossen rijden : de dirty roads. De TET-paden of ACT-paden raadplegen geeft weer andere inzichten. Je zou een Waypoint-Generator kunnen ontwikkelen dat een scenic route of rondrit opstelt op basis van bijvoorbeeld wijngaarden of kastelen in de Loire streek of de beste uitzichtpunten vanuit je startpunt. Langs rivieren of langs kustlijn of Romaanse kerken of de whisky route in Schotland (kan gevaarlijk zijn) Dankzij super software, want ik gebruik niet graag het woord artificiële intelligentie, kan je hiermee ook aan de slag. Er is met de motorfiets al zoveel te ontdekken in Europa dat je eigenlijk nooit tweemaal dezelfde route hoeft te rijden binnen de ons omringende landen. En inderdaad, zoals hier gezegd is, kan dat lokale bevolking ook tips geven: ik heb het al meegemaakt met Italiaanse boswachters in de bergen. En dan zijn er ook die vele onverhardeimin of meer vlakke wegen met waterplassen en kleine geulen zonder over rotsblokken en boomstammen te moeten rijden met die zware Allroad motorfiets.

@Jem-Cotton said in MyRouteApp (WebPlanner) development Roadmap: Hi. When we had our last interchange about prospects for the web planner, I was cautiously optimistic. Cautious because we've had many promises in the years that I've been using it, of a big nd much overdue overhaul - not tinkering with the appearance, but addressing core usability. In the event, the expected 'announcement this or next month' now feels like a brush off, and accordingly I am feeling cheated that I invested in a lifetime membership in a product that is in effect largely stagnant. It's such a pity as for very little work in real terms, big improvements could be made and the result would I'm sure validate the faith put in the development team by countless lifetime gold membership users. Sorry to sound negative, but we've been here too many times. It could be worse! You could have paid £600 for a Garmin zumo XT for them to leave everyone with no development even when issues are pointed out to them and whats causing the issue they just brush it off and do nothing! At least MRA is getting developed

Nee, in de huidige Web Applicatie is dat helaas niet mogelijk.

@Guzzist said in MRA_Routeplanner - difference between Track and Route-Track?: For me, there is no difference between self recorded Tracklogs to Track. I guess we don't agree on this one... I would hate my ordently managed routes to be spoiled by tracklogs. You can however save a tracklog as gpx, and re-import it as a route-track. Otr just import received tracklogs as route-track instead of tracklog. This way you will find them amongst your routes.

das scheint mir ein interssantes Problem für den Stammtisch https://forum.myrouteapp.com/post/68296 RT

@Brian-McG and @Brett-Bartick and @M.-Schrijver, to add to the confusion I recently learned that since some recent version low resolution tracks are being included to routes. So, my previous claim from about half a year a go is not really valid anymore. Fact is that nowadays, when navigating "track-as-route", you indeed get a track that should look like it was originally planned, instead of being calculated at the time of starting it in navigation. Personally I indeed saw an increase of sync-time that could be explained by this, but I have no clue as to when that started.

@Timo-7 als je op de kaart komt komt daar een vormingspunt. Als je de linker muisknop vasthoudt verschuift de kaart en komt er geen vormingspunt