Autoskip confusion
-
In the app, I have enabled Skip Waypoints Automatically.
During todays ride, I deviated from a route on purpose, and got prompted that waypoint 3 would be skipped. I had a couple of seconds to prevent this, if I should want to.
Nice features. But it got me wondering exactly which waypoint I was about to miss.How about adding the waypoint name to the prompted message?
If size is an issue, then the names first X characters.Maybe it wasn't even a waypoint getting skipped, but just a shaping point? In that case the wording in the prompted message was incorrect.
-
@Makro Only shaping points can be automatically skipped. Via points (waypoints) have to be manually skipped.
-
@Nick-Carthew said in Autoskip confusion:
@Makro Only shaping points can be automatically skipped. Via points (waypoints) have to be manually skipped.
Thank you for the clarification.
So, since the popup uses the word waypoint, the wording in the popup must be incorrect.I noticed it because of the on screen. It would be nice if this notification of skipping a shaping point, was also a spoken notification.
-
@Makro The word Waypoint is a generic term used for a longitude latitude coordinate position. Via point and shaping point are terms used by MRA to distinguish the different attributes that can be given to waypoints.
-
@Makro said in Autoskip confusion:
It would be nice if this notification of skipping a shaping point, was also a spoken notification.
Yes, or at least a signal that indicates the skip, so you actually have a chance of pressing the pop up to prevent it.
BTW, shaping points are waypoints just as much as via points.
-
@Nick-Carthew said in Autoskip confusion:
@Makro The word Waypoint is a generic term used for a longitude latitude coordinate position. Via point and shaping point are terms used by MRA to distinguish the different attributes that can be given to waypoints.
Aaah, I see. I come from the Garmin world, where I am used to a slightly different use of terms.
It would however still be a more precise popup message, if the wording said it's a shaping point being auto skipped. But not a big deal now
-
@Makro
I mentioned it before the term waypoint shapingpoint viapoint is confusing, especialliy the use of shapingpoint, whoever bring this word in the world of Navigation it is wrong.
in the source of words Via is latin and the original meaning is somewhere through or over a place in German -über-
The train is traveling via Ulm to Munic. This does not say that he stps there.
So if you use a real street to adjust your route you did not shape over this street you ride via this street.
Garmin call it Waypoint with alarm on without alarm.
Other nav-planner do not split waypoints in a „shaping“ or viapoint they use only viapoints.
If you look in dictionaries for viapoints with a stop the term „milestone“ is used. -
@Peter-Schiefer, Sweet jesus... Just get used to the words....
The train is traveling via Ulm to Munic. This does not say that he stps there.
No, but it DOES say that it goes THROUGH there, which is exactly the meaning of a viapoint: you MUST go through there. Whether you stop or not you can decide for yourself. Wanting to stop there however ca be a good reason for it to force going through there.
Garmin call it Waypoint with alarm on without alarm.
MRA does not and they can decide for themselves, just like Garmin can.
Other nav-planner do not split waypoints in a „shaping“ or viapoint they use only viapoints.
That's ultimately stupid, because that way you cannot have autoskip with having forced VIA points. It is exactly your lines that spread confusion over the terminology. The concept is not that hard to grasp.
-
@Peter-Schiefer I totaly agree with @Con-Hennekens... In MRA, fortunately, we can distinguish between waypoints we definitely want to visit (viapoints) and waypoints we use 'only' to shape our route (shaping points). I find it as clear as can be!
-
@Rob-Verhoeff
one of the advantages of German language is, what makes it difficult too is the precision in lot of words, not all but the most.
And when the meaning of thousands is 2 multiplied by 2 is 5 it is not correct. A known sample is the use of the word prototype. A common understanding ist testversion, pre-sample but this is wrong. Best to explain is prototype on a forgine die wich is used to forge a wheel. the first part of a new die is the prototype. when the die is worned and you use a new die with exact the same dimension for the wheel and you forge the first one then this is the prototype of this die but not for the part himself.
But I will not go in a disput discussion, it has no additional value. shaping point is in the world
By the way translation for shaping to dutch is -formgeven-
May this is word which can be used for the planning, whatever the form looks at the end, zig-zag, circle, but for the routingengine each point is a fix point on the map which you normaly want pass (through) and you will drive. too, therefore it a viapoint. The idea behind this SPs was the limit in the Routingengine in the number of fix viapoints, using an algorythmus to accept on open number of flexible waypoints, when for sample traffic problems need a route adjustment.
And a track at the end is always a number of viapoints in a very short distance.
But her I will stop too, I am to the IT expert to explain it better. -
@Peter-Schiefer said in Autoskip confusion:
By the way translation for shaping to dutch is -formgeven-
You need to update your translation app!
-
@Rob-Verhoeff it is not mine it is Google.
And in German it is at leo and other translaters als -Formgebung- = formgeven.
but this is not my problem to accept the correct things and for me as I said. The things are like they are. -
Please don't tell us how Dutch works, even Google knows better:
And maybe better also not how English works:
But her I will stop too, I am to the IT expert to explain it better.
???
The rest: TL;DR