V5.1.0 - 462 New altitude/heading shows incorrect Data
-
It’s just a nice extra feature! It’s not like your life depends on the altitude display shown by the navigation system. I see it as a fun gimmick. Whether I’m driving at sea level or at 1500 meters in mountainous terrain, it’s simply fun to see — nothing more. And I believe that’s exactly how this functionality was intended: nothing more and nothing less. Apparently, some phones handle it better than others.
🏍️ BMW K1600GT-P (2013) | Nolan N100-5 with Sena 30K
📱 iOS on iPhone 13 & 16 (mounted on Quadlock or AliExpress extention on BMW-cradle)
🚙 Apple CarPlay in VW T-Roc
💻 Routelab on MacBook Air & iMac (Tahoe & Ventura) -
It’s just a nice extra feature! It’s not like your life depends on the altitude display shown by the navigation system. I see it as a fun gimmick. Whether I’m driving at sea level or at 1500 meters in mountainous terrain, it’s simply fun to see — nothing more. And I believe that’s exactly how this functionality was intended: nothing more and nothing less. Apparently, some phones handle it better than others.
@Rob-Verhoeff I totally agree with you Rob. It was just this discussion, which let me check just at home, because I know the hight there
-
It’s just a nice extra feature! It’s not like your life depends on the altitude display shown by the navigation system. I see it as a fun gimmick. Whether I’m driving at sea level or at 1500 meters in mountainous terrain, it’s simply fun to see — nothing more. And I believe that’s exactly how this functionality was intended: nothing more and nothing less. Apparently, some phones handle it better than others.
@Rob-Verhoeff Agree also. Just a fun thing. Elevation isn't even critical when hill walking. I'm more of a map and old Silva compass person for that activity. I have started to use OSMand a bit whilst walking.......its a slippery slope (sorry couldn't resist)
-
In The Netherlands our level is based on NAP. GPS level is based on a globel level. for yhe netherlands it is arround a 40 meter differance then our NAP.
-
I also see the altitude information as a nice addition, but my main concern is the incorrect direction. It seems the direction is reversed, and west/east are swapped. North/south is displayed correctly on my Android devices.
-
I also see the altitude information as a nice addition, but my main concern is the incorrect direction. It seems the direction is reversed, and west/east are swapped. North/south is displayed correctly on my Android devices.
@Reinhard-Punz You mean the red stripe in the compass? It always pointed to the north as far as I can see.
🏍️ BMW K1600GT-P (2013) | Nolan N100-5 with Sena 30K
📱 iOS on iPhone 13 & 16 (mounted on Quadlock or AliExpress extention on BMW-cradle)
🚙 Apple CarPlay in VW T-Roc
💻 Routelab on MacBook Air & iMac (Tahoe & Ventura) -
It’s just a nice extra feature! It’s not like your life depends on the altitude display shown by the navigation system. I see it as a fun gimmick. Whether I’m driving at sea level or at 1500 meters in mountainous terrain, it’s simply fun to see — nothing more. And I believe that’s exactly how this functionality was intended: nothing more and nothing less. Apparently, some phones handle it better than others.
@Rob-Verhoeff, That is of course true, but does not reason away why other apps show it right
If correction is possible, I am all for it.I am just an enthusiastic MRA user, and hope you will be one too!
Most motorcycle problems are caused by the nut that connects the handlebar to the saddle.
Check out RideSleepRepeat.eu, a biker community for sharing stays across Europe
-
@Reinhard-Punz You mean the red stripe in the compass? It always pointed to the north as far as I can see.
@Rob-Verhoeff Yes, exactly. The screenshot shows that I'm facing southwest, but the compass is pointing southeast. I'm at an altitude of approximately 331 meters.
-
@Rob-Verhoeff Yes, exactly. The screenshot shows that I'm facing southwest, but the compass is pointing southeast. I'm at an altitude of approximately 331 meters.
@Reinhard-Punz, I don't think the direction you are facing is relevant. It's the direction you are moving to that is. It looks like you are stationary. Then it will not work.
-
@Rob-Verhoeff, That is of course true, but does not reason away why other apps show it right
If correction is possible, I am all for it.@Con-Hennekens It's true that in this example I was on foot (so very slowly). But I observed the same thing yesterday during a long car ride.
-
I think the red bar is showing North and all is correct, am I wrong?
--
Regards
Staszek -
@stanisław You could be right but is not more logical the top is always North and the red part the direction of riding?
-
I'm not trying to judge. I'm just taking what the app gives me, Corjan usually knows better
-
I think the red bar is showing North and all is correct, am I wrong?
Oh, I hadn't thought of that. It may be intended that way, but I find it very confusing. I think it would be much more logical, as M. Schrijver suggests: north at the top, and the red part indicating the direction traveled.
-
@reinhard-punz
As written in Post #8, I already thought that you misunderstood the meaning of red part.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login-
-320387
-
0550
-
0599
-
0358
-
09150
-
0320
-
1228
-
0236
