Reading out the name of the waypoint and associated notes

[Lenny O]

It is a great feature that you can actualy audibly hear the name of the waypoint and teh associated notes!!! Super!

BUT.... it gets really annoying when it reads EVERY shaping point, of which you can have many.
One can opt for announcing the VIA points only, but for various reasons one may not wish to make a waypoint to be a VIA, but rather keep it a shaping point.

If there was a way to only read out the waypoints (VIA and Shaping) that have notes, I think it would be awesome!
Since the announcement comes about 1/2 mile from the waypoint location it is a very cool way to be ready for a view of an attraction, announce it to the group you are leading, etc,...

I really would love to use that function all the time on scenic solo and group rides that I lead many of.

Is there a way to do so that I am not thinking of?

Thank you foir your thoughts!

[Herman Veldhuizen]

name and note can be empty fields.
but indeed the shaping points would still be announced ("upcoming", "reached").
there is as far as I know currently no way to omit these.

[Mzokk]

@Lenny-O For what reason would you not want to turn it into a via so that you could hear the notes??

[Lenny O]

@Mzokk for one, I want the autoskip to work.
I want to be free to ride and watch the road, not touching the screen if I can help it.
But in any event, why would I want the announcement that I've arrived at the shaping point that is nothing more than a shaping point and carries no significance otherwise...
I can also see that I've arrived to it.
The name and the Notes are the driving force to even consider using this great option.
So, let's make it usable without forcing all the irrelevant info upon the user.

[Mzokk]

I’m sorry that makes no sense. Either you want to see an attraction make notes and have it announced. Or you don’t. I too lead groups and often plan routes with optional loops since if you are riding with 5 six 7 riders time slips by. I occasionally skip via points to save time otherwise they are announced. Shaping points are unannounced and will be automatically skipped if the route is changed by any type of diversion. Pretty simple really.

[Lenny O]

@Mzokk I guess we see things differently... if my reasoning does not make sense to you, so be it

[M. Schrijver]

@mzokk
What @lenny-o says make totale sense. Viapoints forces you to do something. And that is the last thing you want when riding a route. A navigation needs to guide you not forcing. Me as a person forces to navigation to do something. I always say: "A navigation needs to guide and follow you at the same time".
That's why i never use viapoints, only shapingpoints. But i also use colors and notes on my shaping points. To point out things along the road. But if i mis them, also fine. No worries.
Just like @lenny-o i also like to have a separation between the standard shaping points and the shaping points with additional notes and/or color. There is absolute no need to have an announcement for every waypoint. Just the shapping points which matters are enough.

[Con Hennekens]

A VIA point should be just there as an obligatory routepoint (thus to prevent it from auto skipping), and for no other reasons.

[Lenny O]

I think it should be quite easy to implement the distinction between the points having Notes and the ones that do not for read-outs. (I am a retired IT programmer).
Another super annoying thing when it reads out ALL shaping points is that it first reads out the location of the waypoint, and I mean FULL ADDRESS, including the Country and the postal code..... before it actually reads the Notes.
To prevent that you'd have to rename or blank out the address of EVERY shaping point, which is crazy
So, in combination the great, needed and very usefull feature is not used by many because of not being "user-friendly" (as we call it in the IT world).

[Con Hennekens]

@Lenny-O, It's not an address field, it's a name field. The name field is not being spoken when [it contains numeric characters] AND [the note field is empty]. So when a note is added, the name AND note is being spoken, with or without any numeric characters. So, what I always do, is give the waypoint a sensible name. Often that is enough, and if you want to add more then use the note field.

[Herman Veldhuizen]

@lenny-o there are more wishes. i myself dont want to see some (shaping) points while navigating, nor am I interested in the ETA info.

[Herman Veldhuizen]

@con-hennekens the app doesnt have to behave the same as other apps. i agree with @m.-schrijver here that auto skipping via points is a useful feature.
just like the waypoint notification, there could be a setting for the auto skipping: None, Shape or All. Maybe best to introduce when also "route aware" navigation is supported by Here such that we are not sent back anymore. For me that would be the biggest improvement in the app for years.

[Lenny O]

@Herman-Veldhuizen I think you can avoid seeing them if you turn off "Use all waypoints" not sure of wording , do not have the phone with me at the mpoment). It is the last option in Navigate / Functional screen.
Someone please correct me if I am wrong.

[Herman Veldhuizen]

@Lenny-O Because of the fact that via points cannot be skipped, i use shaping points for all points. Therefore the setting for all points needs to be on.

[Mzokk]

Well, I like the fact that my Via points can only be skipped manually when I decide to skip them. I was just looking at a route I recently used which was 250miles ~ 400km it had 5 via points that I did not want to miss, and 34 shaping points. If there was a switch to automatically skip via points I'd want it to default to OFF so that I didn't, miss the Via points I actually wanted to see.

I think we all have our prefered ways of doing things. I would like the app to be capable of displaying custom POI's without running a route, and that certain POI's would have a proximity warning because I use POI loader with my garmin devices and like the flexibility of going for a ride and just routing to some of the POI's that pop up as nearby (For example I have a database of neolithic Dolmen.) I think that in the planner, track handling and POI handling/information could be improved and I could finally abandon Basecamp. But perhaps these requirements are niche to me and most folk would not want such features??