@Con-Hennekens said in My first experience with V 4.2.0 - 321:
@M-Schrijver said in My first experience with V 4.2.0 - 321:
Please delete the "Continue Navigation" functionailty. It doesn't add anything useful.
You must be joking, right?
Nope.
If you asked me (and you did). Just a START button for starting a route and a STOP button for emerencies. Everything else should be handled by the software.
In my opnion the goal is to create a software package that is so easy to use that all peope ditch their Zumo or TomTom Rider and start using MRA Next.
The group of people i'm focusing on, is the group of people who takes the bike for holidays (long or short), currently get their GPX files from a third party (travel agency or friends) and just put those files unchecked in their navgation device. Those people just press START and expect everything goes smooth until the end of the trip.
This is a very big group of people. But it is a hard group to create software for.
Saying this won't mean MRA should ditch the current functionality. But should put the intellengence in the planner.
The current functionality is great, but can be to difficult to use. Keep the entry level at a low level.
There is also a group of people who wants more from their navigation. Those are mostly early adopters and are the people who are frequently here on the forum. Those people should also be served but for this group it is not real an issue to put those extra functionality on a level deeper. They will find this level in the software. Also those people tends to create/check their routes by themselves before driving the routes. This loops back to my sentence "put the intellengence in the planner".
By putting the intellengence in the planner can cause a rise in users. Because third partys could starting using MRA to share routes. Doing this. Entry level users can get routes which are easy to use and have all the functionality you can put in a route as a route creator.
I see it every day on my work. We have multiple machines which do more or less the same from multiple brands. We have 1 machine from a brand which did write the software/gui brilliant. It is very easy to use and very easy to learn. Despite this you can do the same as the other brands which are more diffucult to learn and use.
The group of people who uses these machines is the same type of people who gets their GPX/Routes from a third party and put them unchecked in the navigation devices.