Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Support
  • MyRoute-app
Collapse
Brand Logo

MRA Community Forum

  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. Why Won't MRA Follow the Beartooth Highway

Why Won't MRA Follow the Beartooth Highway

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
17 Posts 6 Posters 157 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Brian McGundefined Brian McG

    Hi @Lenny-O it is not magic, it is just old / out of date map data
    I think the Here map data that MRA is using for this road still has its winter setting, so it set as closed

    if you try to route along this road it will always try & look for an alternative that is not set as closed
    at your points WP6-WP7 and WP8-WP9 there are alternatives, even if they are not practical because of gates etc, & the Here routing opts for the alternative that is not closed rather than the closed road

    you can make it route along the closed road between WP6-WP7 and WP8-WP9 just by adding additional points

    LennyOundefined Offline
    LennyOundefined Offline
    LennyO
    wrote last edited by LennyO
    #8

    @Brian-McG You are correct!
    I was able to force it to go straight thru by adding waypoints!

    But that brings in another interesting point.

    I know for sure that when HERE knows some road as "closed", there is no way you can force it to use it, no matter how many waypoints you try and add, unless you activate "disable seasonal closures".
    So, the fact that by adding more points I am able to force it to stay on tells me that these spots are NOT designated as "closed" on HERE maps.

    Then, in this example Bear Tooth is the main road and with no avoidances selected why in the world would the HERE algorythm start taking you off the main road?
    What am I missing here?

    Positive emotions are worth every penny ;)

    Brian McGundefined John S Parryundefined 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • LennyOundefined LennyO

      @Brian-McG You are correct!
      I was able to force it to go straight thru by adding waypoints!

      But that brings in another interesting point.

      I know for sure that when HERE knows some road as "closed", there is no way you can force it to use it, no matter how many waypoints you try and add, unless you activate "disable seasonal closures".
      So, the fact that by adding more points I am able to force it to stay on tells me that these spots are NOT designated as "closed" on HERE maps.

      Then, in this example Bear Tooth is the main road and with no avoidances selected why in the world would the HERE algorythm start taking you off the main road?
      What am I missing here?

      Brian McGundefined Offline
      Brian McGundefined Offline
      Brian McG
      wrote last edited by Brian McG
      #9

      @Lenny-O-R-Xpert I think it depends on how the closure is set in the map data
      sometimes a closure can be set as a single point on the road like a waypoint, other times it can be set as hundreds of points more similar to a track

      the routing algorithms are not that clever, it is just a case of is this path greater than or equal to the alternative path

      if a closure is set as a single point you can fool the algorithm into routing through the closure by placing your waypoints near/close to the single closure point so the calculation becomes approximately equal to or shorter than the alternative path

      if the closure is set like a track you would need to add hundreds of waypoints to overcome each & all of the closure points

      another way to confirm if a route is actually passable & prove that the Here map data is poor/bad is to turn on the "Traffic" data & zoom close in, you get a nice green confirmation that the route is open / flowing
      e18d2f6e-eb1f-48c8-a911-ffae04ea42b6-image.jpeg

      BlackView BV7100, Android 12
      Navigate "Routes as Tracks" in Offline mode with Offline Maps
      No Wifi, no internet, no interruptions, works well

      LennyOundefined 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • LennyOundefined LennyO

        @Brian-McG You are correct!
        I was able to force it to go straight thru by adding waypoints!

        But that brings in another interesting point.

        I know for sure that when HERE knows some road as "closed", there is no way you can force it to use it, no matter how many waypoints you try and add, unless you activate "disable seasonal closures".
        So, the fact that by adding more points I am able to force it to stay on tells me that these spots are NOT designated as "closed" on HERE maps.

        Then, in this example Bear Tooth is the main road and with no avoidances selected why in the world would the HERE algorythm start taking you off the main road?
        What am I missing here?

        John S Parryundefined Online
        John S Parryundefined Online
        John S Parry
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @Lenny-O-R-Xpert Lenny, I think it's simply a difference between how the respective MRA HERE and other base maps calculate the route. HERE has a preference for calculating across a more major route when available. You can see the same bias in a calculated route crossing the Southern Sierra in California:

        Screenshot (350).png

        Adding additional shaping points gets you the desired results:

        Screenshot (351).png

        In general, it's always best practice to overload shaping points in more rural areas. Especially if the route is going to be exported to a Garmin device that has completely different calculation algorithms.

        LennyOundefined 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Brian McGundefined Brian McG

          @Lenny-O-R-Xpert I think it depends on how the closure is set in the map data
          sometimes a closure can be set as a single point on the road like a waypoint, other times it can be set as hundreds of points more similar to a track

          the routing algorithms are not that clever, it is just a case of is this path greater than or equal to the alternative path

          if a closure is set as a single point you can fool the algorithm into routing through the closure by placing your waypoints near/close to the single closure point so the calculation becomes approximately equal to or shorter than the alternative path

          if the closure is set like a track you would need to add hundreds of waypoints to overcome each & all of the closure points

          another way to confirm if a route is actually passable & prove that the Here map data is poor/bad is to turn on the "Traffic" data & zoom close in, you get a nice green confirmation that the route is open / flowing
          e18d2f6e-eb1f-48c8-a911-ffae04ea42b6-image.jpeg

          LennyOundefined Offline
          LennyOundefined Offline
          LennyO
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @Brian-McG So, assuming that you are correct about how HERE works their maps (I, personally have no idea about that) it's safe to say that the HERE somehow screwed up and we are at the mercy
          of their work "under the hood" in designating closures and being up to date, making them not 100% reliable.
          That's pretty sad, considering that it is our preferred MRA engine.

          Positive emotions are worth every penny ;)

          Brian McGundefined 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • John S Parryundefined John S Parry

            @Lenny-O-R-Xpert Lenny, I think it's simply a difference between how the respective MRA HERE and other base maps calculate the route. HERE has a preference for calculating across a more major route when available. You can see the same bias in a calculated route crossing the Southern Sierra in California:

            Screenshot (350).png

            Adding additional shaping points gets you the desired results:

            Screenshot (351).png

            In general, it's always best practice to overload shaping points in more rural areas. Especially if the route is going to be exported to a Garmin device that has completely different calculation algorithms.

            LennyOundefined Offline
            LennyOundefined Offline
            LennyO
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @John-S-Parry Yes, you are correct! I am totally aware of that.

            Positive emotions are worth every penny ;)

            John S Parryundefined 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • LennyOundefined LennyO

              @John-S-Parry Yes, you are correct! I am totally aware of that.

              John S Parryundefined Online
              John S Parryundefined Online
              John S Parry
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @LennyO OK, so do you still believe your previous statement that "HERE somehow screwed up and we are at the mercy"?

              If the MRA version of HERE, in many cases, has a different routing algorithm than OSM/TomTom that simply favors more major roads, where is the screw up? I'm asking from the position of understand/learning.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • LennyOundefined LennyO

                @Brian-McG So, assuming that you are correct about how HERE works their maps (I, personally have no idea about that) it's safe to say that the HERE somehow screwed up and we are at the mercy
                of their work "under the hood" in designating closures and being up to date, making them not 100% reliable.
                That's pretty sad, considering that it is our preferred MRA engine.

                Brian McGundefined Offline
                Brian McGundefined Offline
                Brian McG
                wrote last edited by Brian McG
                #14

                @LennyO no Here have not screwed up the world is round & we are all ok 😂

                the only issue here 😂 is that the map data that MRA is using for the Beartooth Highway is a little bit out of date
                the Beartooth highway normally has a closure for the winter & this closure is in the set of map data that MRA is currently using in the planner & app
                e9add942-bb0e-4c6a-948f-e7aac0161ce4-image.jpeg

                it is the nature of maps & has been since they were invented, as soon as they are printed they are out of date
                I believe MRA takes a snapshot of the Here map data every time they do an MRA update
                occasionally you will get cases like this where the map data is a little bit behind & this is why the "Disable Seasonal Closure" option is part of the toolkit

                BlackView BV7100, Android 12
                Navigate "Routes as Tracks" in Offline mode with Offline Maps
                No Wifi, no internet, no interruptions, works well

                LennyOundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • Brian McGundefined Brian McG

                  @LennyO no Here have not screwed up the world is round & we are all ok 😂

                  the only issue here 😂 is that the map data that MRA is using for the Beartooth Highway is a little bit out of date
                  the Beartooth highway normally has a closure for the winter & this closure is in the set of map data that MRA is currently using in the planner & app
                  e9add942-bb0e-4c6a-948f-e7aac0161ce4-image.jpeg

                  it is the nature of maps & has been since they were invented, as soon as they are printed they are out of date
                  I believe MRA takes a snapshot of the Here map data every time they do an MRA update
                  occasionally you will get cases like this where the map data is a little bit behind & this is why the "Disable Seasonal Closure" option is part of the toolkit

                  LennyOundefined Offline
                  LennyOundefined Offline
                  LennyO
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @Brian-McG That makes sense, absolutely!
                  So then, HERE-MRA map updates communication should be improved!
                  I know from some of the previous discussions that HERE is not the fastest to deal with and we all are sort of at their mercy.
                  I am sure the mothership reads this and will correct the situation!

                  Positive emotions are worth every penny ;)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • John S Parryundefined Online
                    John S Parryundefined Online
                    John S Parry
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @lennyo It's too much of a diversion to address in this thread, but HERE is HERE. Their maps traditionally have issues with timeliness of updates, accurate road closure information, and even accurately placing roads where they actually should be. It's a simple reality that the MRA developers have to deal with, and that they are forced to deflect from in the various forums.

                    I mostly use MRA Routeplanner to create routes for GPX export into my Garmin devices. I've given up using HERE as the base map (for the above reasons) and use OSM instead. I've created dozens of critical routes used OSM as the base, and they import correctly into Garmin devices without issue. I'm comfortable that OSM a 100% GPX export solution, and I don't hesitate to use it.

                    Unfortunately, using NN requires development on the HERE map. It's one of life's inconveniences you'll have to work around. There are many creative (but awkward) solutions that have been presented in the forums for moving forward in most scenarios.

                    LennyOundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • John S Parryundefined John S Parry

                      @lennyo It's too much of a diversion to address in this thread, but HERE is HERE. Their maps traditionally have issues with timeliness of updates, accurate road closure information, and even accurately placing roads where they actually should be. It's a simple reality that the MRA developers have to deal with, and that they are forced to deflect from in the various forums.

                      I mostly use MRA Routeplanner to create routes for GPX export into my Garmin devices. I've given up using HERE as the base map (for the above reasons) and use OSM instead. I've created dozens of critical routes used OSM as the base, and they import correctly into Garmin devices without issue. I'm comfortable that OSM a 100% GPX export solution, and I don't hesitate to use it.

                      Unfortunately, using NN requires development on the HERE map. It's one of life's inconveniences you'll have to work around. There are many creative (but awkward) solutions that have been presented in the forums for moving forward in most scenarios.

                      LennyOundefined Offline
                      LennyOundefined Offline
                      LennyO
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @John-S-Parry i agree.

                      Positive emotions are worth every penny ;)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      ACTIVE USERS
                      LennyOundefined
                      LennyO
                      John S Parryundefined
                      John S Parry
                      Brian McGundefined
                      Brian McG
                      Nick Carthewundefined
                      Nick Carthew
                      Stevedo 6 0undefined
                      Stevedo 6 0
                      Sam Kramerundefined
                      Sam Kramer
                      POPULAR TOPICS
                      • Why Won't MRA Follow the Beartooth Highway
                        LennyOundefined
                        LennyO
                        0
                        17
                        157

                      • inconsistent travel times
                        Brian McGundefined
                        Brian McG
                        0
                        11
                        167

                      • Creating routes on HERE versus TomTom
                        Nick Carthewundefined
                        Nick Carthew
                        0
                        11
                        183

                      • Compass is not working properly
                        Jörgenundefined
                        Jörgen
                        0
                        12
                        501

                      • Windroos foutief
                        De Ploey Georgesundefined
                        De Ploey Georges
                        0
                        5
                        69

                      • GPX Versions 1.1 vs 1.2 for Garmin Visually Explained
                        Steve Jarrellundefined
                        Steve Jarrell
                        7
                        38
                        2.5k

                      • Anyone tried Ridernav R7M with MRA via AA yet?
                        PieterGundefined
                        PieterG
                        0
                        64
                        7.3k

                      • Updated beta! 5.2.1 (486)
                        Hubert Thoringundefined
                        Hubert Thoring
                        7
                        32
                        385

                      MY GROUPS
                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Popular
                      • Support
                      • MyRoute-app