@adrian-avram Thank you!

@Corjan-Meijerink in de IT kan een nanoseconde al voldoende zijn

@Travellexxie said: bullsh** I have a XT and I only use version 1.2. Try with the connector or else just export the 1.2 edition, drag it to the folder /GPX of the XT, restart your XT and it will directly save it as a trip and a track will be saved. That's been my experience too. Both on my XT and my XT3. The drag-and-drop method works. Always. And it's simple. Using intermediary apps (Drive/Tread) and Connectors can break for various reasons. And usually at the worst possible times.

@corjan-meijerink 1.) From what I understand, having a gold lifetime subscription already, and joining the beta, would add collaboration and group rides, functionality-wise. Is there a description what the group ride add-on offers? Does it mean others (a group) can navigate a route I created together, live? Do they need a MRA Next (the smartphone app) subscription for that? 2.) I find the described AI fearures appealing. Is there going to be a lifetime access available, as well, and when can we expect ro learn a price tag for it?

For me it is just the opposite. MRA Next is my back up. Never needed it so far. I always optimize any route in the web version before I export the gpx1.1 and import it into BC and optimize it again before sending it to he XT through Drive or directly via cable (which I prefer). Even then, as the algorithmes of the gps and the web version are not the same, recalculation in the gps may come with some surprises. But having the BC track always visible one can interprete the directions properly.

@Con-Hennekens I live in the USA, So, I just downloaded all the states that I needed. Thanks,

@Peter-Zehentreiter perfect, thanks very much.

@de-craene-steven als je het hebt over de "MRA RouteXperts" overlay Je moet inzoomen op een schaal <5km [image: image.jpeg] if you are referring to the "MRA RouteXperts" overlay you have to zoom into a scale <5km

I don't think Garmin is going to abandon the Zumo at all, after all, it does have it's place and they have released the XT3 fairly quickly after the XT2, which IMHO they weren't pressured to do (Nothing wrong with the XT2) They have however, abandoned Basecamp, which was, in it's time a very powerful planning tool, now however far superceded by MRA. I too have switched from a Garmin unit (Zumo 550) to a Android Auto Screen, a cheap Ali Express one for now, let's see how I like it (Or not). I understand that some of the more expensive ones do have thier own GPS and internal battery, maybe I'll go there later. Live traffic flow indicators, Incident reporting (Sabre, etc) and rain radar are features I'd like to see on any dedicated Nav unit. Which was my only reason to consider the XT2 when they came out. XT3 priced right out of reach for me....So off to a $80 Tablet!

To do ze choose the download button in the app and choose pdf Or on the web planner export to pdf

Helaas is Here kennelijk niet in staat om snel te reageren. Je zult altijd dus zelf ook en beetje mee moeten denken. Hier kan MRA niets aan doen.

Mittlerweile geht das auch sehr gut in der App … [image: IMG_1358.jpeg] [image: IMG_1359.png]

...sending the link as @con-hennekens wrote, is fine for let me say single action. If it happens often, I prefer to have a dedicated folder "for friends" - always with access right "for friends", as @peter-zehentreiter wrote. If it's needed to share a route, I simply move or copy my root into this folder. My friends knows about this folder...

@stuart-marritt my guess is that because the path was created via OSM & you were therefore navigating a Track, the "Skip Waypoint Function" is not as relevant as it would be when navigating in Route mode if this Route had been created with the Here map & you were then navigating this path as a Route, then I think your expectations that the Route would continue to point 15 when you have Automatic Skips turned OFF is 100% correct in track navigation mode the track is what the system tries to follow & the system has optimised itself to get back on track by heading towards point 18 but not really going to point 18 but the part of the track just south of point 18 as I understand it in Track navigation the path is made up multiple small Tracks between Via points if you have no Via points it is just one long Track & shaping points are no more important in track navigation than any of the 1000's of other points that make up a track really I am just guessing & applying a bit of logic to the scenario, your going to need one of the forum illuminati / Alpha / Beta testers who knows more about the guts of the path calculation to answer this definitively

@Michael-Doherty-0 I was in the same situation as you....as I said, send an email to support with your requests..... You'll definitely get a reply