Creating and populating Events should be renewed too!

[Guzzist]

I'm surprised at the lack of response and no discussion here.
Apparently, the group of bikers who only plan routes from A to B, or a circular route lasting 1 hour, or who use AA/CP, are louder. And they seem to be tying up all the developers' resources.

This is somewhat frustrating, as many other tools on the market offer these simple planning tools. However, MRA has much greater potential—but it should also be kept up to date.

Long-distance travelers, storytellers, and event organizers need these special capabilities of MRA...

[Hubert Thoring]

@Guzzist:
I can only agree, the overall focus is missing. The MyRouteApp/MRA Web Planner can do much more than just know and use a lot. The MAR app in MRA V4.4.x is/was already very good, so why the launch of the MRA V5.0 beta now?
@Corjan-Meijerink
The Web Planner will soon need the full, preferential attention of the developers. What Guzzist wrote is also a wish for me... MRA can do a lot, but the fine-tuning is still missing, as described above...

Many thanks to the MRA Team!

[Jörgen]

Perhaps the reason for the lack of feedback is that most people don't use it?
Have you checked out the blog feature?

[Con Hennekens]

Guys, we are talking about a small dev group. One big project at a time please. You bought a subscription for what it does, not for what it might do in the future. That being said, devs already promised a large scale overhaul of the web-planner. Just be patient, it is already being worked on.

[Guzzist]

@Con-Hennekens I posted it in "General Discussion" - simply to start a discussion and to make visible, there are wider expectations from users as currently are apparently perceived.
The features mentioned are there, but they are no longer up to date, or no longer work as they did, after updates.

I am certainly not making a demand, but rather exercising patience. I would just like to provide input for the website redesign in good time – before the work is finished and it is too late.

[Con Hennekens]

@Guzzist, at the moment I am totally unaware of any plans of beta versions. I think it is too early for that. And to be honest, too many individuals trying to force their own important stuff into any program will lead to chaos. The foundation needs to be thought up by knowledgeable people with consensus. I have confidence in the dev team

[Guzzist]

@Con-Hennekens ...I thought this was a discussion thread – and that everyone could express their opinion in a friendly manner. So I'm glad that you're contributing your opinion to the discussion. And I usually appreciate your contributions.

But somehow your comment to me feels a little harsh and patronising. That may not have been your intention. It may be that something was lost in translation...

[Con Hennekens]

@Guzzist, no that is definitely not my intention, sorry if it feels that way.
What I meant is that the foundation needs to be thought up by the dev team and their inner circle. They are quite capable. People like you and me come in afterwards to give their opinion about the program, and their ideas will or will not be taken as advice. I think no-one can program software around all good intentions and ideas that are given in advance, given the fact that everyone has individual and very diverse ideas of what they think is important. Advice from the forum is perfectly fine, but the dev-team will always be leading.

[Corjan Meijerink]

Groups and events will definitely be completely overhauled.
After the v5 app release (and some expected feedback / fixes after) we will shift the focus to developing the new website.

When working on that we will definitely rework how groups / events work entirely.

[Guzzist]

@Con-Hennekens I'm fine with you