@Nick-Carthew-RouteXpert Then why not make it a user-selectable checkbox, for these users, in these cases, who want to see them anyway (switched off by default) ? (just a suggestion)

@Andreas-1o After importing such a route In BaseCamp, you can convert all these route-composing waypoints (alerting you when passing along the point) into (what is called here) "shaping" points (NOT alerting you when passing along it). How ? Select all these points, right-click, and select "do not alert" (or something like it in BaseCamp's English version). You shouldn't delete them ?!

Hello !

I am a new member. I'm Belgian (Flemish). Registered some time ago, and tried the base membership. Then I let that tryout rest, but I'm currently trying out a Gold membership, as there are some nice Gold membership's features I wanted to try out. I just changed my forumname from "A B" into something more meaningful...

Kind regards !
sudolea

@Nick-Carthew-RouteXpert OK. I hope the route maker doesn't consider my findings as criticism. On the contrary : I think it's a nice route, and I will most probably ride one of her other routes in the near future (as the weather forecast is quite nice for the rest of this week)

@Nick-Carthew-RouteXpert Thank you for the clarification. Meanwhile, I learned another feature of the Gold toolkit (i.e. to compare a route against several other engines). I fail to find the disclaimer though (not that I need it : sounds entirely logical).

Hello,

I am trying out the Gold membership, and while using and learning the MRA Web application, I came along e.g. this route. I didn't find any way where I can import the route without anomalies. More specifically, when I look at the original, there is a waypoint anomaly between 49-50-51 (and it seems to be the only one). Then I import that route ( = I save it as gpx 1.1). Viewing it then with the Openstreetmap and the HERE engines, shows the route with that same "anomaly" at that specific location. This would make me think the map is intended to be used with one of these. However when then looking at the rest of that route with the Openstreetmap engine between waypoints 9-10-11, the route is (again) totally different to the original. With the HERE engine, I then see the original route coming back again with (only) that same (to my feeling) anomaly between 49-50-51.

But then, to my surprise, when looking at the route with the GoogleMaps engine makes the anomaly at 49-50-51 disappear ?! Looking at it with the TomTom engine, yields an extra anomaly between 40-41-42. So probably that route was made, and intended to be used with the GoogleMaps engine ? But it would seem to me that these routes are to be used with the HERE engine. So I am puzzled.

Hence my question : which is the appropriate way to use public routes, OR to get to know which engine is to be used ? Sorry if I missed some information that I should have read before asking my question here, but then please feel free to point me to the appropriate information ...